<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Antanova Ltd. &#187; Usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antanova.com/category/blog/usability/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antanova.com</link>
	<description>We make excellent websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:08:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sins: Don&#8217;t break the back-button</title>
		<link>http://antanova.com/blog/usability/sins-dont-break-the-back-button</link>
		<comments>http://antanova.com/blog/usability/sins-dont-break-the-back-button#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason C</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antanova.wordpress.com/2007/05/21/sins-dont-break-the-back-button/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was looking at the website of a local design agency the other day. I&#8217;ve worked with them in the past creating a few small sites. Their previous website was quite a nice, quirky html site that I thought served them well. Now, they&#8217;ve moved to a 100% flash site for some reason. It&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking at the website of a local design agency the other day. I&#8217;ve worked with them in the past creating a few small sites. Their previous website was quite a nice, quirky html site that I thought served them well. Now, they&#8217;ve moved to a 100% flash site for some reason. It&#8217;s a mystery to me, because they have some full-time web developers working there. I can only assume that the marketeers there saw that they could have lots of motion and thought that would be a good idea.</p>
<p>It reminded me of an old chestnut that needs re-hashing: <strong>don&#8217;t break the back button</strong>.</p>
<p>You may wonder why, if you include something similar within a Flash movie, you should not break the browser&#8217;s back button.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a question of trust. Users vary significantly in their confidence when it comes to using a web browser. Part of the &#8220;deal&#8221; they have going is the consistent &#8220;language&#8221; they use to communicate with it. If you do something ninety-nine times and each time get a consistent result, then changing that on the hundredth attempt is like jumping out from behind a bush shouting &#8220;boo!&#8221; The expectation the user has — rightly — is that hitting the back button will take them to the state the screen was previously in. They don&#8217;t care whether that&#8217;s embedded in an object and not a separate URL. I&#8217;m with them on this: it&#8217;s incredibly annoying to progress through several screens of a flash site, hit the browser &#8220;back&#8221; button and then be booted out back to a completely different site.</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t do it. If you must have a completely Flash-based site, then do it sensibly. There are several utilities out there for this. You could use <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/">SWFObject</a> combined with <a href="http://www.asual.com/swfaddress/">SWF Address</a>, but there are others. </p>
<p>Technorati: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/usabiility">Usability</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://antanova.com/blog/usability/sins-dont-break-the-back-button/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
